Introduction
At the United Nations Secretary
General’s Climate Change Summit, on the 23rd of September 2014, the 2014
Global Investor Statement on Climate Change was presented.
Who
contributed? This Statement was drafted through a collaboration of
six organizations: the Asia Investor Group on Climate Change (AIGCC), the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC),Ceres' InvestorNetwork on Climate Risk (INCR), the Investor Group on Climate Change Australia/New Zealand (IGCC), the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI), and the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI).
The 2014 Global Investor Statement on
Climate Change states the contribution that investors can make to increasing
low carbon and climate resilient investments. It offers practical proposals on
how contribution may be accelerated and increased through appropriate
government action. Highly ambitious climate policies are called for in the
Statement which would and can help grow such pockets of leadership. The 2014
Statement was accompanied by another report which shared current investor and finance sector
leadership actions on climate change. This report complements the Statement and
highlights that finance sector leadership on climate change is not only
possible but already happening today.
Who were
the signatories? Signatories to the global statement are Institutional
Asset Owners and Asset Managers from around the world. Initial Signatories were
listed (348 global institutional investors representing over $24trillion in assets) on the Statement presented at the UN
Secretary General’s Climate Change Summit on 23 September. Investors will be
able to sign the statement after its launch, up until 15 November 2015, prior
to the COP 20 meeting in Lima.
The 2014 Global Investor Statement on
Climate Change has called on government leaders to provide stable, reliable and
economically meaningful carbon pricing that helps redirect investment
commensurate with the scale of the climate change challenge, as well as develop
plans to phase out fossil fuel subsidies.
Study of the Signatories
This study was conducted to better understand the signatories listed on the above statement. For more information on the study, get in touch with the ClimateMiles team or email us at climatemiles@gmail.com
Focus points:
The list primarily consisted of fund managers – some of
whom explore responsible investment options and have been doing so for a while.
Almost all have very loose social/environmental impact missions stated on their
websites. There were also many church organisations that have set-up funds to
explore social-related investments such as better housing, health, community,
food, sanitation and clean water. None so far have mentioned being part of the 2014 Global
Investor Statement on Climate Change on their websites.
Countries
of operation
A majority of the funds were based in USA,
the rest in Canada or Europe. Fund managers were also mainly North American, but had offices in Europe, Australia including South and
Southeast Asia. A few operated in India. Even fewer in Africa.
ESG
& Responsible Investments: Projects invested in
Many of the signatories take into account environmental, social and governance (ESG) impacts when conducting their investment
analysis and dring decision-making processes. ESG issues often affect companies and
sectors over time, they may also affect investment performance and therefore some
have stated that they have started exploring ESG issues that could have a
material impact on their investment performance. Most of the common ESG/Sustainable
projects invested in are:
Approach
to choosing investments
Most of the fund managers explore long-term investment opportunities for their clients. Those who
explored responsible investment had their own internal policy and process for
choosing the sectors/ projects to invest in. Often dedicated ESG teams were
created to conduct focused studies to identify risks and opportunities. Some
asset-managers had even signed on to the Principles of Responsible Investment
as early as 2007.
A majority made generic statements
about making socially beneficial investments, and mentioned some sectors of
interest, but did not provide specific parameters for their investment
strategy. Some had CDP partnership, or collaborations with other voluntary regulatory bodies.
Detailed descriptions on the previous
investments and the impact of the same were not shared.
Highlight(s)
No comments:
Post a Comment